Order under articles 4 and 5

WHEREAS there is a substantial lack of liquidity and a significant risk in the outflow of deposits which are likely to endanger the survival of the credit institutions with a chain reaction that could lead to the instability of the financial system and to destabilising consequences on the entire economy and the society of the country.

 AND WHEREAS under the circumstances a state of emergency is created, to safeguard public order and public security and for overriding reasons of public interest,  12(I) of 2013The Minister of Finance, in exercising the powers conferred by articles 4 and 5 of The Enforcement of Restrictive Measures on Transactions in a Situation of Emergency Law of 2013, following a recommendation of the Governor of the Central Bank, issues the following Order:  Short title.1. The present Directive shall be referred to as The Enforcement of Restrictive Measures on Transactions in a Situation of Emergency First Order of 2013.  Interpretation2. (1)  In the present Order unless the context shall otherwise prescribe:   «Committee» means the Committee that is introduced under article 9 of the Law.

 «Law» means The Enforcement of Restrictive Measures on Transactions in a Situation of Emergency Law of 2013.

«Credit or debit or prepaid card» means credit or debit card or prepaid card issued by credit institutions.

(2) Terms not defined in this order shall have the meaning ascribed to them by the Law.  Imposition of restrictive measures.

3. By virtue of articles 4 and 5 of the Law, and following the recommendation and agreement of the Governor, the following restrictive measures are imposed:

(1)    A maximum amount of cash withdrawal is imposed, which shall not exceed the daily limit of €300 per person per credit institution, or its equivalent in foreign currency. All cash withdrawals (through debit cards, prepaid cards, and from the bank’s tellers and using credit cards against balances in current accounts) are computed per account holder for all his accounts in each credit institution.

Provided that any amount of the daily cash withdrawal limit, which has not been withdrawn during the day for which the cash withdrawal limit applies, can be withdrawn at any time afterwards.

(2)  The cashing of cheques is prohibited.

(3)  Any cashless payments or transfers of funds outside the Republic or to accounts held with other credit institutions is prohibited, except that:

(i)             Payments for transactions that fall within the ordinary business activities of customers upon presentation of supporting documents as follows:

(A)  Payments of up to €5,000 daily per account are not prohibited;

(B) Payments of amounts from €5,001 to €200,000 are subject to the approval of the Committee. A list of applications for payments that fall within this category shall be submitted to the Committee by the credit institution on a daily basis and shall state the amount of each payment, the total amount and the number of payments that fall within this category. The Committee in making a decision, which must be made within 24 hours, shall take into account the available liquidity reserves of the credit institution.

(C) Payments of amounts of €200,001 or more, if the prior approval of the Committee for the specific payment is obtained after an application has been made by the credit institution. The Committee in making a decision shall take into account the available liquidity reserves of the credit institution.

(ii)           The Payment of employee salaries upon presentation of supporting documents.

(iii)          Living expenses up to €5,000 per quarter, as well as the tuition fees of a person that is studying abroad and is a first-degree relative of a person who has his habitual residence in the Republic. Provided that any payment of living expenses is only permitted if documents are submitted to the credit institution evidencing that the recipient of the cashless payment and/or transfer of funds is a first-degree relative of a person who has his habitual residence in the Republic. Provided further that payments of tuition fees may only be made to the relevant educational institution if supporting documents are submitted.

(iv)          Payments and/or transfers of funds by debit or credit or prepaid card, up to €5,000 per month per person per credit institution.

(4)  The termination of fixed term deposits before the maturity date is prohibited, unless the deposit shall be used for the repayment of a loan within the same credit institution.

(5)  On the first maturity of fixed term deposits, an amount equal to the greater of €5,000 and 10% of the total principal amount of the fixed deposit, shall be transferred, at the option of the depositor, to a sight/current account or deposited in a new fixed term deposit of the depositor in the same bank. For the remaining balance, the maturity shall be extended by one month.

(6)  Funds from transferred from fixed term deposits to sight/current accounts will be subject to the restrictive measures applicable to sight/current accounts.

(7)  Exports of euro notes and/or foreign currency notes exceeding €1,000 or its equivalent in foreign currency per natural person per journey abroad is prohibited. The Director of Customs shall implement this measure.

(8) Any financial transaction, payment and/or transfer that was not finalised before this Order came into force shall be subject to the restrictive measures. Provided that any financial transaction, payment, and/or transfer that was not processed before this Order came into force shall be cancelled and must be resubmitted.

(9) Credit institutions are prohibited from executing any cashless transfers that facilitate the circumvention of the restrictive measures.

(10)The restrictive measures apply to all accounts, payments and transfers regardless of the currency denomination.  Exemptions.4.  Exempted from the restrictive measures are:

1. All new funds transferred from abroad to the Republic.
2. Withdrawal of cash from accounts held abroad using credit or debit card or prepaid issued by foreign institutions.
3. The cashing of cheques issued on accounts held with foreign institutions abroad.
4. Withdrawal of cash from account of credit institutions with the Central Bank.
5. The Republic.
6. The Central Bank.
7. Diplomatic missions.
8. Payments that have been approved by the Committee.

Force of this Order

27 March 2013. This Order shall stay in force for a period of seven days from the date on which it is published in the Official Gazette of the Republic.

Michalis Sarris

Minister of Finance

Crimes committed: why are no bankers in jail?

How nice of you: that gift you just made to charity. No one asked you if you wanted to make the gift. No one asked you which charities you’d want to support. But still. You made it. So thanks. Well done.

 If you’re confused – if, by chance, you don’t remember authorising anyone to pick your pocket to give to charity – then welcome to the world of financial services. Here’s how it works. Greedy, irresponsible morons on huge salaries and inflated bonuses take RBS, one of Britain’s leading banks, and trash it to the point of insolvency.

Because Gordon Brown’s government forgot the first rule of capitalism – that lousy firms should be left to go bankrupt – you rescued RBS using your money, your savings, your taxes. You, along with your fellow British taxpayers, now own 82% of the bank. In a small way, you’re a world-record holder: the bailout of RBS was the world’s costliest bank bailout. Congratulations on that. (Though again, I’m not sure you had a choice.)

Now, unfortunately, it turns out that those same overpaid, irresponsible morons ran an institution in which the manipulation of interest rates was endemic. Manipulation which made money for them, the bankers, at the cost of ordinary members of the public. It’s pretty obvious what ought to happen. The people who manipulated rates should go to jail. The people who supervised them should either go to jail (because they too were conspirators in the fraud) or they should be disbarred from business forever (because they’re too stupid for anything complicated.)

But needless to say, that’s not what happens in Cameron-land, any more than it did in Brownania. No, what happens is this. RBS is fined. It’s paid £87.5 million to the Financial Services Authority and has made all the right noises about learning its lessons. (Fat hope.)

Lord Turner should resign immediately giving his pension to taxpayers who bailed out RBS !

But the thing is, you own the bank. So that fine hits you. It doesn’t hit the idiots who managed the bank. It doesn’t hit the fraudsters directly responsible for the manipulation. Now although that’s hardly good news, it would be almost OK, as long the FSA simply returned the money to the Treasury, so that in effect you’d have been paying the fine directly into your own pocket. But that kind of common sense offends those in government. So instead the FSA passed the fine – the one which you paid – to charity. So you now have the rare privilege of (i) having shelled out for the costliest bank bailout in history with no chance of ever being repaid, and (ii) having given £87.5 million to charity. Well done.

But the figure that really counts? The figure that really counts is zero: the number of bankers in jail as a result of all this mess. Oh, and curiously enough, that number is identical with the number of brain cells registering electrical activity at the FSA. It’s enough to make one weep.

My printing presses are operating 24/7!

On the first day of Christmas, my country gave to me

A debt bigger than GDP

Yep, that’s right. US Public debt stands at more than 100% of GDP. The last time debt was this high, we were fighting a World War across two continents and building a peaceful prosperous world, whose basic shape would endure for generations. That was money worth spending. On this occasion, however, we’ve run up the debt, in order to protect Wall Street bankers – yet the sebanks are still crammed full of unsustainable assets. It won’t be long before the Fed further loads its balance sheet with worthless toxic assets … thereby transferring liabilities from the reckless bankers to US citizens. Maybe not quite such a good buy, huh?

On the second day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Debt for the poorest

According to Nobel Prize-winning economist, Joseph Stiglitz, the share of American GDP going to wages and salaries has falled to about 43% since 1970. At the same time, the slice going to companies in after-tax profits has doubled since just 2005. How have the US middle classes even vaguely been able to sustain their living standards? Answer: by taking on unpayable debt that chokes the financial system and throttles economic growth. It’s an appalling situation and it’s not set to change.

On the third day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Bernanke trashing dollars

Impact of money printing and currency debasement

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, is not an elected official. Prior to taking his current job, he was a classic ivory tower economist: a guy who couldn’t do any harm because no one was dumb enough to give him any power. Then he took control of the Fed: an organisation whose structure and oversight has barely been altered since 1913 when it was created, under vastly different conditions. Back then, GDP was just $40 billion. By contrast, in 2011, the interest on US debt was $454 billion despite interest rates at 200-year lows. Since taking charge of the Fed, Bernanke has printed trillions of dollars – a plan that trashes the value of the dollar in your pocket, and a plan with no plausible exit strategy. The plain fact is that pumping money into the economy does nothing to boost real growth or real output – it just inflates bubbles in property and stock, as has been shown repeatedly for thirty years and more now. If you’re not convinced, just check the graph.

On the fourth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Overpriced healthcare

Good quality healthcare is, in my view, a human right and Obamacare, for all its faults, brings that right a little closer to millions of Americans. But the United States, under every administration and every Congress, has completely lost control of health costs. We currently pay about $8,000 per head in health costs. (That figure includes household, corporate and government spending.) Our major competitors spend between $2,900 per head (Japan) and $4,500 (Canada). And they have better healthcare. To find OECD countries with worse performance on ‘years of life lost’, you have to travel south to Mexico or east to Hungary. All other countries in the OECD fare better.

On the fifth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Quarreling leaders

Iceland is no banana republic

We pay politicians to solve problems, right? We just had an election at which alternative views were put to the people, for their decisions on the way forward. And this country of ours has some fair-sized problems. So what happens? We have the ultimate This-Needs-A-Decision-Now situation in the fiscal cliff, and both sides cleave to their existing rigid positions until (wait for it) they come up with some dumb and unsustainable last minute compromise. That’s not what they’re paid to do. These same politicians think that raising the debt limit will stimulate the economy. Wrong! At a global level, the growth in credit instruments has outpaced growth in the real economy by a factor of around four times. That’s not healthy for the world, and it’s not healthy for the debt-dependent United States. I predict that the US will enter a recession in 2013.

On the sixth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Corruption on Wall Street

You could have a whole 12 days song just for Wall Street corruption and its toothless regulators, so endemic is the problem. But let’s narrow the microscope, so we’re only looking at SEC enforcement

Zero high profile bankers in jail = 0 regulation

actions since 2009. Firms affected include: Citigroup (multiple times), Commonwealth Advisors, Goldman Sachs, ICP, JP Morgan (multiple times), Mizuho, Stifel Nicolaus, Wachovia, Wells Fargo, American Home Mortgage, Bank Atlantic, Countrywide, Credit Suisse (multiple times), Franklin, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Indymac, New Century, Option One Mortgage, Thornburg, TierOne, Bear Stearns, Charles Schwab , Evergreen, Morgan Keegan, Oppenheimer, Reserve Fund, State Street, TD Ameritrade, Bank of America, Brooke Corp, Brookstreet, Colonial Bank, Taylor Bean & Whitaker, KCAP Financial, and UCBH. The list includes firms where executives from that firm were charged. In total, 133 entities and individuals have been charged. Total penalties and similar charges amount to $2.6 billion. Aside from the SEC, other regulators have been equally active. And has anything fundamental changed? Nope. Nothing at all. Wall Street is still rotten to its core. And why would it change? When these fines represent perhaps 10%, if that, of the ill-gotten gains why on earth would bankers change their business models? They just need to keep paying the toll.

On the seventh day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Despairing workers

This time its worse..

One of the big talking points ahead of the election was whether the jobless rate would come to Obama’s rescue. And sure, the rate has nudged down to below 8.0%, from closer to 10.0% three years ago. But that’s not the most striking piece of economic data to come out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The most striking – and saddening – data is that we now have, by far, the lowest civilian labor force participation rate for thirty years. Workers are leaving the labor force because the jobs aren’t there. It’s a waste of a generation. Meantime, we should use a new unemployment metric that reflects the true US jobless rate rather than a politically sanitized version. A little honestry, transparency and accountability can go a long way.

On the eighth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

Corporate tax scams

GE's CEO advises the Obama administration on economics, go figure!

In 2010, General Electric paid no corporation tax. None. Not even one miserable dollar. In the five years to 2010, GE accumulated $26 billion in US profits and do you want to guess how much of that was passed to the IRS? You’re guessing zero, right? Unfortunately, you’re wrong. The answer’s worse than that: they accumulated a net benefit of $4.1 billion. Oh, and though the firm is America’s biggest corporate lobbyist, the truth is that countless big firms are playing the same game – and the data shows that the more you lobby, the better your shareholders fare. I’m guessing that’s not quite the way the Founding Fathers intended things to work.

On the ninth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

A huge Farcebook rip-off

Morgan Stanley banked profits on this IPO

Just in case anyone needed proof that Wall Street has absolutely no ethics at all, the Facebook IPO popped up to remind us. Extravagant valuations on launch led to an intra-day high of $45.00, before reality set in and the stock plunged to a way more realistic $17.55. The winners: company insiders and Wall Street. The losers: the retail investors who believed the hype. (Oh, and since we’re talking about hype, then Apple at its current $500 a share is way more reasonable than it was at closer to $700. It’s a wonderful firm, but it’s in a commodity business where the competition, finally, is catching up.) On Facebook, meantime Morgan Stanley has just been fined $1.5 million for an operation whose profits were well in excess of that sum. Again: why change a business model if the fines are mere pinpricks?

On the tenth day of Christmas, my country gave to me

The power to hope

Ho HO HOPE

This is America. However bad things get, we can still believe in the possibility of improvement. We can believe that our leaders will find the ability to be responsible, to think about the good of the country before the good of their parties. We can believe that the media and regulators can find their teeth. Can demand transparency and enforce accountability. Above all, we can believe in the power of the American people to demand change. To slash debt, return to honest money, to speak truth in politics. And perhaps, who knows, we can return to the old ways of making money: by making stuff and selling it instead of through ever more opaque financial dealings based upon fictional future value, a mountain of debt, and way over-leveraged derivative products.

A merry Christmas to you all.

Four More Years

Obama’s an accomplished individual. Smart, cool, in control. But his standout quality is probably his ability to create euphoria. Create it, sustain it, ride it. Watch the people celebrating with him at his victory rally in Chicago and you could easily believe that the USA had just won a war or beaten a recession.

Unfortunately for Obama, reality doesn’t have much time for speeches. The economy was dire going into the election. Coming out of it, you can almost hear the engine failing.

Let’s take the first indicator of failure – the stock market. The market mood darkened in September and October, then dropped abruptly as news of Obama’s victory sank in. I don’t actually think that’s because Wall Street hates Obama. I think it’s more that as the election hoopla dies away, investors realise how little they can expect from the government, how bad the economic situation really is. And, for that matter, how bad the political situation is. The House remains solidly Republican, the Senate comfortably Democrat – and the whole divisive status quo guaranteeing gridlock for another four years.

Over the next few weeks, you’re going to hear a lot about the fiscal cliff. In January 2013, a whole lot of things happen together. George W. Bush’s tax cuts expire. A payroll credit expires too. Some automatic spending cuts are imposed across the board. (These last cuts, of course, aren’t thanks to some outbreak of sanity in Washington, but a bad compromise cobbled together in the course of 2011’s debt ceiling crisis.)

The fiscal cliff is huge, and real. Its impact is potentially around 5% of American GDP. By contrast, George Osborne’s fiscal tightening amounts to little more than 1% a year. If you want to get your head round what a comparable tightening would imply in the British context, then just imagine that the basic rate of tax increases by 10 pence in the pound overnight. Or that spending in the NHS is halved, again overnight.

No economy is strong enough to take that kind of punishment. The British economy is struggling to come out of a double-dip recession even with its own weak-as-milk pace of tightening – and, indeed, I think a triple-dip recession is highly probable. The fundamentals of the US economy are in some ways better than ours (less reliance on the finance sector, less proximity to European travails) but a 5% cut in economic demand overnight? The result will be crippling.

Although the US jobless rate has improved slightly in recent months, that’s only because dispirited workers have left the jobs market altogether. The US employment rate is a horror story. Piling a massive fiscal shop on top of those weak fundamentals, and you’re going to see a massive rise in unemployment. (If you look at U6 unemployment data for the US it’s hovering close to 15%, a shocking stat.)

You might think that the solution is obvious. If the fiscal cliff is so bad, then simply decrease the slope. Go for a slow-but-sure Osborne-style tightening so the budget deficit floats gently lower. And sure enough, there are plenty of economists, living comfortably in their ivory towers, who suggest just such a solution.

But that solution is not available. The IMF – hardly a sensationalist organisation – says that the elimination of America’s long run fiscal gap requires both a 35% increase in all taxes and a 35% cut in all entitlements. The fiscal gap is heinous, but it’s only the first step. It doesn’t even take America where it needs to go.

It gets worse. If fiscal policy can’t save America, how about monetary policy? Alas, and just like in Britain, monetary policy is all out of gas. Interest rates can’t go any lower. quantitative easing (QE) has reached its limits. (And, in any case, QE is little more than a way to rescue Wall Street at the cost of inflation for the rest of us.) The worst thing that could happen to America is that Ben Bernanke, the unelected Chairman of the Federal Reserve, tries to rescue things. The best thing that could happen is that he goes on holiday for four years, having left his Blackberry in the office.

The Princeton Professors Economic Experiment

In short, America’s problems are profound and there is no way to deal with them except one that imposes huge short-term costs on the economy and the people. I don’t think it’ll get quite as bad as it has done in Greece – the US economy has a lot, lot more about it than that – but most of the pain still lies ahead.

And in matters of finance, everything is circular. So the government needs to raise taxes and slash spending to sort out its debt problems. The result: a huge reduction in demand and heavy job losses. The result: countless homeowners being unable to service their mortgages and a huge rise in ‘jingle mail’, as homeowners send their house keys to the foreclosing banks. The result: an already weakened banking system sinking further under a tide of ill-advised boom era lending. And of course, as all this happens, the economy will shrink, which means that the US government has to slash spending yet further in a desperate effort to keep its deficit reduction efforts on track.

These words might seem apocalyptic, but I’ve been saying these things for a while. (My book, Planet Ponzi, has the whole story, and it’s out in paperback now.) What’s more, we’ve already seen disaster scenarios such as these come true in well-managed countries of the developed West. Spain had a much lower debt to GDP ratio than the US. It had better supervised banks and less casino-banking. But we all know the state that Spain is in: a death-spiral that even Germany may not be able to help with.

And the signs are everywhere in America. Go-go stocks have lost their lustre. Facebook trades at little more than half its IPO price. Apple, for so long a do-no-wrong stock market darling, is down more than 20% from its recent highs. Businesses are hoarding cash, because they don’t dare invest it, don’t dare return it to shareholders.

I don’t suppose Mitt Romney thinks of it like this, but you could argue that the 2012 election was a heck of a good one to lose. America has outrun financial reality for decades now. Debt-fuelled, government-funded. The future bought on the never-never.

But the debts are falling due. Reality is knocking at the door. And the fiscal cliff is only the start.

Shhhhhhhh!

But wait up. A hundred billion Euros? Lent secretly? On unknown terms and conditions? And the entire operation conducted by a bunch of unelected officials and scarcely reported in the media.

Please don’t think that these things happen in Europe but could never happen in the United States. They happen here all the time and on a colossal scale. Remember that Bloomberg fought the Federal Reserve all the way to the Supreme Court in order to establish that the Fed lent over $1.2 trillion to the US banking system and that those loans went ahead unbeknownst to and unauthorised by Congress. Oh, and although I say ‘the US banking system’ what I really mean is ‘any bank that puts its hand out for some cash.’ So the Federal Reserve considered it appropriate to hand over some of your dollars to such not-very-American institutions as the Royal Bank of Scotland, the Belgian bank Dexia, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, the Italian Unicredit, and too many others to name.

Yet nothing happens. When Bloomberg broke its story about the Fed’s secret lending programme, a few other news outlets picked it up, but nothing changed. The same people are in charge of the Federal Reserve. They don’t think they did anything wrong. No central banker thinks that the ECB did anything wrong by handing a hundred billion euros to the collapsing banks of a failing country. It’s just the way these guys do business.

Just to be clear, though, there are alternative ways to do business. You might, for example, think that we should follow the following elementary rules: the central bank should avoid printing money and generating inflationary pressures which affect us all; bankers should lend money prudently and with proper due diligence; if those loans go bad, the banks should lose their money; and, over time, those banks are either left to go out of business (if they’re dumb) or encouraged to shape up and improve (if they’re not.) That system even has a name. It’s called capitalism. We had it in America once.

But not any more. We live in a world where moral hazard reigns supreme, where acts of gross stupidity seem to lack consequence. Where central bankers print money and no one cares. Where banks make dumb loans and get bailed out. Where politicians just want to get re-elected and know that the media is going to analyse the spin down to the very last molecule and leave the substance well alone.

Take some other recent news items. Facebook’s IPO saw its shares trade up to $45 before falling back to as little as $31, a fall of some 31%. It is alleged that Morgan Stanley, one of the banks running the stock offering, revealed data to its institutional clients that it did not share with its retail clients – data that, in effect, called into question whether Facebook’s high valuation could be justified. Morgan Stanley insists it followed every dot and comma of the relevant regulations, and perhaps it did. But retail investors have still lost a shedload of money. And Morgan Stanley and its peers have still made a huge amount in fees. If Morgan Stanley truly did follow procedures, those procedures are plainly inadequate.

Or take JP Morgan’s recent $2 billion trading loss. That arose in a bank which prides itself on its careful risk management. Which has lobbied vociferously against regulations which would prohibit the kind of activities which led to that loss. A bank which is surely ‘too big too fail’ – and in my eyes, therefore, also too big to exist.

Yet nothing changes. Just ask yourself these questions. Will the Fed never again extend secret loans to dodgy banks? Will Wall Street firms never again run an IPO that destroys billions of dollars in value for retail investors? Will Wall Street so clean up its act that it never again reports billion dollar losses because of dumb-but-greedy trades?

You know the answers. Nothing changes. In Europe at the moment, a calamity is unfolding. The Spanish bank, Bankia, has had its shares suspended as it seeks to apply for yet more state aid. The Spanish government, terrified by the way the ground is moving under its feet, is beseeching the Germans to help them borrow more money, so they can pass that money on to the same unreconstructed banks that lost it all in the first place. And meantime government deficits go on adding to the ever-less-supportable mountain of debt.

The United States is not yet in that position, but the preconditions are all here. An uncontrolled deficit. An out-of-control banking system. And politicians who would rather defer any problem than tell the truth about the mess we’re in.

This article was published in todays Huffington Post

Swervyn Mervyn Loving the Serving

Nice to be so secure in your job that you can reject any idea of checks and balances on your all-but-supreme power. Nice that ex-Chancellors of the Exchequer view you as some Sun King beyond any check. Nice to have a £400,000 salary and plenty of time to enjoy Wimbledon in the middle of an economic crisis.

But does Merv the Swerv actually know what he’s doing?

Let’s see. His job, his main one, is to make sure that inflation is at 2%, give or take 1%. Inflation has recently fallen to 4.2%, having been 4.8%. That’s a lot more than 2%.

And it’s also not the real inflation rate. The new headline stat they like to throw at you is CPI – the Consumer Price Index – which ignored mortgage interest payments. But mortgages need to be paid. You can exclude anything you like from a price index, but that doesn’t make it a sober record of changing values.

And if you look at the RPI – Retail Price Index – you find that inflation is a stunning 4.8%, down from an even worse 5.2%. What’s more, this awful record is no blip: it’s been running this way for years.

What’s more, these terrible statistics ignore strong suspicions that the official index vastly understates the inflation which most ordinary people face in their lives. A study by the Resolution Foundation suggested that, over the decade to 2010, the cost of essentials soared by some 43% – way more than the 27% reported in the official stats. A recent study for the Mail found that the elderly faced inflation rates of 10% or more – rates that they simply have to pay if they want to heat their homes and put food on the table. Electricity prices are up on average around 17%.

If you have a front row seat on Centre Court and have that nice £400,000 salary to take care of things, you probably don’t care too much about these facts – but millions of ordinary Britons are in no position to be so complacent. (The same, of course, is true of US citizens under the kindly rule of Helicopter Ben Bernanke. – We’ll deal with those issues another day.)

Meantime, speculation is growing that Swervyn Mervyn is keen to indulge in yet another round of Quantitative Easing – a polite way to say printing money. And what does printing money do? It creates inflation. That’s what happened in Weimar Germany, what happened in Zimbabwe. What always happens everywhere, when the printing presses create too much currency.

Inflation won’t bother the Sun King. If you’ve got a nice job and don’t have to worry about food, fuel and transport prices, maybe it won’t bother you. But it bothers ordinary people a lot. They’re hurting now and will hurt much worse if the country sees more QE. The Sun King should stick to tennis. Inflation fighting is clearly not his game.

Although other ratings agencies have confirmed their AAA rating of France, we would like to call your attention to the fact that no one believes them. Bloomberg’s story, here, calls attention to the fact that:

“Investors aren’t waiting for Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s Investors Service to strip France, Europe’s second-biggest economy, of its top credit rating.

The extra yield demanded to lend to AAA rated France for 10 years was 158 basis points more than the German rate at 11:51 a.m. today. The gap was 200 basis points on Nov. 17, the widest spread since 1990, up from 28 in April. The French 10-year yield was at 3.5 percent, about midway between top-rated Holland and Belgium, which is graded one level lower at Aa1 by Moody’s. French borrowing costs are more than a percentage point above the AAA rated U.K.”

Bloomberg aren’t quite going to say this out loud, but the point is simple. If it looks like a dog, and barks like a dog, and wags its tail like a dog, you can pretty much bet that it IS a dog.

The same thing with bonds. If the markets trade French debt like it’s not really AAA, then that debt isn’t AAA. More scary still, we haven’t yet had a glimpse into the huge losses concealed inside the French banking system. Once those come into the open, we’re going to see that even at their current distressed prices, French bonds have a long, long way to fall. It ain’t over till it’s over – and the fat lady has yet to sing.