But here’s the thing. Do you care to guess how much J&J lost thanks to that currency movement? Answer: a cool hundred million dollars. Johnson is a pretty large company, but even so. To lose a hundred million bucks? In Venezuela? That sounds a little disturbing, no? A bit like the start of one of those killer-virus horror flick, where the pretty teenager who comes down with a benign little illness ends up dying horribly as some unknown disease takes hold.

Central Planners Bernanke, Draghi & Merkel Hard at Work

Well, that is now the reality of the world economy. The loose money policies at the world’s leading central banks are beginning to broadcast that virus right across the globe. The vector of transmission isn’t just low interest rates. It’s money printing too. It’s the purchase of government bonds so that the long end of the yield curve is as manipulated as the low end.

Indeed, you simply can’t set a bound on how widespread and intensive the destruction of value has been, not merely in the U.S., but across the globe. Take, for example, the Fed’s willingness to purchase toxic real estate assets — using your money to acquire securities which are now shunned by the market. Or take the Bank of England’s efforts to shove easy money at banks making corporate loans. What happened to good old-fashioned faith in markets? The belief that transactions of commercial merit will be struck between a willing buyer and a willing seller … and that any other sort of transaction should be strongly discouraged?

The simple fact is that the world’s major central banks are indulging in a massive proprietary trading scheme placing your money at risk in support of poor quality assets. When I wrote Planet Ponzi, I argued that Wall Street and government between them had created the world’s biggest ever Ponzi scheme. Well, the central banks want to play at that table too — and right now they’re the ones with unlimited money and zero accountability.

In recent months, the Japanese yen has plummeted 30 percent against the euro and some 20 percentagainst the U.S. dollar. Those figures are astounding enough in themselves, but get this: The euro currency probably won’t even exist in a few years’ time. The outcome of the Italian election gave a more than quarter of the vote to a comedian, Beppe Grillo. (He is literally a comedian; I’m not just using the term as a synonym for “Italian politician.”) Grillo wants to exit the euro and default on Italian debt. Other parties shared nearly all the remainder of the vote. The only politician to stand four-square behind Angela Merkel’s austerity ad infinitum plan was Mario Monti, who secured just one tenth of the vote.

Grillo’s plan, as it happens, isn’t dumb. The euro has been killing Italy, and though Italian debts are high, they are, for the most part, funded domestically and the national budget is not far from being in balance. So Grillo’s plan keeps it simple: quit the euro, self-fund the debt, go back to doing what Italian governments have always done. If that sounds nuts, bear in mind that Italy’s economy has been a post-war miracle — growing way faster than the U.S. economy, albeit from a lower base. Italy only really started to fail when it joined the euro: Meaningful growth has been absent ever since. Italy’s competitiveness — never so secure — has been systematically wiped out by its adventure with the euro.

If Italy follows a path that’s anything like the one Grillo has mapped out for it — or if civic unrest grows — or if some European bank found itself obliged to admit to the true value of some whole new pile of nasties on its balance sheet — then the euro is dead; but this is the currency against which the yen is devaluing.

The precise path of these currency wars is impossible to predict, but it’s not hard to predict the final outcome. First, there will be huge losses. Japan has an economy that’s almost twenty times larger than Venezuela’s. If Johnson & Johnson can lose $100 million in Venezuela, just how much more will be lost in the Far East and Europe, not just by that one company but by every other multinational one too?

Spain's civil disorder - A coup d'état in the air? Euro departure?

Secondly, civil unrest. We’ve seen bouts of unrest already surging across the world — from riots in Greece, to the Occupy movement, to the indignados in Spain — but these things are only going to get worse. Suppose, for example, that Italy does successfully quit the euro; what will that say to the Spaniards and Greeks and Portuguese and Irish who are currently suffering its death throes?

And thirdly: inflation. The trouble with currency wars is that they’re too easy to wage. You just have to print money. The mainstream media barely reports the ongoing activity and the Fed is either in denial or lying. It all sounds a little technical and dull. We assume that the people in charge of looking after our money supply are on our side, that they have our interests at heart.

But do they? Again and again, we see that central banks make the error of equating happy financial markets with strong economies — precisely the mistake that was made by central banks ever since the dot-com crash (and, indeed, before.) Here’s the simple truth. Financial markets prefer excessive valuations and excessive liquidity. Sure, they love it if the Fed prints a ton of new money. Obese kids would probably like it if McDonald’s gave away their stuff for free on street corners.

But the interests of Wall Street are not your interests. Global stock markets are making new record highs — on what? What’s so great about the world economy? The truth is that stock markets are up because of Fed-based ‘hopium’: the torrents of cash artificially manipulating prices. Yet whatever goes up must come down and no one at the Fed even pretends to have an exit strategy. The simple fact is that the Fed has created the mother of all asset bubbles, and the popping will be on a scale previously unknown.

Indeed, you only have to look at the personnel in key positions across the globe to understand how deeply Wall Street has penetrated institutions that were meant to be there for us.

Jon Corzine - What happened to MF Global's missing Billions? Who said there is no revolving door between Wall Street and Washington?

Mario Draghi, head of the European Central Bank is an ex-Goldman guy. So is William Dudley President of the New York Fed — who controls the FOMC. So is Mark Carney, soon to be Governor of the Bank of England, currently the Governor of the Bank of Canada as well as the Head of the Financial Stability Board in Switzerland. When you start to add in key politicians with affiliations to the same institution (Mario Monti, Hank Paulson, Robert Rubin, Gary Gensler, Jon Corzine), you start to realize that our entire political system has become heavily conflicted and corrupted. The interests of Wall Street have come to dominate the interests of ordinary citizens.

All Ponzi schemes must come to an end. They always bring disaster when they do — but that’s no reason to close them down, because the collapse only gets bigger the longer you leave them. We are in the end stages of a huge, global Ponzi scheme right now. The losses are rising, the risks are getting greater. And the worst disasters lie ahead.

Over the coming weeks, we’re going to be hearing a lot about the ‘fiscal cliff’: the threat that some 5% of GDP is going to be ripped out of the economy in a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts. A fiscal slow-down on that scale will almost certainly trigger recession. The CBO thinks so, though their numbers look optimistic to me. (If you cut demand by 5%, more or less overnight, then you shouldn’t expect the economy to grow by more than 1% in the year following.)

The Feds solution to debt: more debt

Because the process of fiscal compromise acts itself out on the political stage – all big personalities and high drama – the media loves to report it. Loves to imply that vast questions are at stake, that political careers will stand or fall by the outcome.

But they’re not. Not really. This so-called ‘cliff’ is really just the first in a series of steps. The US budget is arguably the most distorted in the Western world. Greece and Japan may have higher debts, Italy and Portugal may have worse growth prospects – but for sheer budgetary insanity, the US is probably the world leader, combining huge current deficits with vast unfunded promises to retirees, and welfare entitlement program recipients. You don’t need to take my word for this. The IMF states, ‘under our baseline scenario, a full elimination of the fiscal and generational imbalances would require all taxes to go up and all transfers to be cut immediately and permanently by 35 percent. A delay in the adjustment makes it more costly.’

The political ructions of the next few weeks will simply constitute the first scenes in a drama that will run for the next ten or fifteen years. And what’s more, this is a play where we already know the ending. Taxes will have to go up. Spending will have to come down. No other outcome is available: just ask the Greeks.

And meantime, there is a monetary time-bomb charged and ticking. A bomb which is being constantly primed with further explosive, further destructive force. Remember that the economic catastrophe of 2008 was created by loose monetary policy, the indisciplined expansion of credit and a market where increasingly shoddy securities were sold as investment grade assets. You might think that a logical reaction would be the steady tightening of policy and encouraging a climate of credit discipline.

Alas, however, such logic has no place at the Fed. Interest rates are on the floor, and have been for four years now. Because four years of loose money isn’t enough for the ivory-tower academics in charge of monetary policy, the Fed has explicitly committed to keep rates low indefinitely.

Loose money in the past, loose money guaranteed into the future … but that’s still not enough. The Fed has enlarged its balance sheet by $2 trillion since the crisis began to unfold. But that doesn’t even say it. The unelected officials at the Fed handed out an extraordinary $16 trillion in secret loans to bail out banks and businesses in the 2008-10 period. Those loans were not known to, or authorized by, Congress and many of the recipients were firms owned and headquarter abroad. Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has much to call attention to these issues, comments, ‘No agency of the United States government should be allowed to bailout a foreign bank or corporation without the direct approval of Congress and the president.’ Well, duh! It’s frankly extraordinary that there should be any question about this.

As Sanders also points out, the actual operation of the bailouts was largely outsourced in large part to investment banking firms on Wall Street who benefitted directly from the bailout. According to the Government Accountability Office, some two-thirds of such outsourcing contracts were awarded on a no-bid basis, an extraordinary failure. And meantime in a ‘money-laundering‘ style operation, the Fed is acquiring $40 billion of low-quality mortgage backed securities – in many cases from the firms that created and missold them – thereby cleaning corrupt balance sheets at the risk of the US taxpayer.

The problems created by this unconstitutional misconduct go far beyond the mere trillions of dollars involved. The US Treasury market is being currently manipulated on a heroic scale. At times we’ve seen the Fed buying as much as 70% of US government bond issuance. Worse still, it’s effectively told the market that it intends to continue supporting the market as much as necessary for as long as necessary. In effect, we have a tiny group of unelected officials pursuing a set of radical and experimental policies – QE infinity, money-printing, unlimited bond buying, call it what you will.

The impact of money printing and the value of the US dollar

And the theory behind this activity is simply crazy. When have price controls and state intervention ever worked? I don’t just mean for the US Treasuries market, but for any major market at any time? State intervention always fails. The Fed is simply setting up what looks set to be the largest Ponzi Scheme in history.

What’s more, because financial markets are interlinked, indiscipline in one market soon ripples through the system and unintended consequences impact many other markets. Wall Street traders, both currently and historically, price junk bonds off the US ten year treasury, which currently trades at an implausible 1.61%. But since the US Treasury market is flawed, every related market is too. As the Economist notes, a bubble is being inflated in government bonds, quality corporate bonds, junk bonds, and (I would add) global equities. As that newspaper comments, ‘When the market does turn everyone will want to head for the exit at once, as was the case with mortgage-related bonds in 2007. That might turn a retreat into a rout.’ I’d agree, except that the word might ought to be will.

The Feds exit strategy: Pray

And all this wouldn’t be so bad, except for one thing. What’s the exit strategy? Could it be hope-based by any chance? How do you climb down from these heights? Who will buy these bonds when the Fed stops? Who absorbs the losses? What exactly happens to the economy when interest rates normalize and bond prices collapse back to normal levels? Indeed, what happens to the banks when they can no longer sell their lousy assets to the Fed, can’t bump up their profits by selling no-bid services to the dumbest buyer in town? Too big to fail is still getting bigger.

The fiscal cliff is scary, because an abrupt one-off change in fiscal posture is a dumb way to do something that needs doing. But still, it needs doing. If a temporary economic slowdown is the price we pay for that, too bad. We’ll still be in better shape for taking the hit.

The monetary neutron bomb is worse. We’re still building it. No one’s talking about it. And the amounts are colossal.

The British calling in the calvary

A hundred years ago, a generation of men – many of them volunteers – fought an unprecedently bloody war for almost invisible gains. The men were heroes, but the generals commanding them were too often blunderers, too little conscious of the ever-mounting casualties. David Cameron is right to demand that our schoolchildren are reminded of the Great War and the vast sacrifices involved.

He’s right, but he’s also showing some chutzpah. History remembers those men as ‘lions led by donkeys’. Heroes betrayed by blundering and unimaginative leaders. We are not – thank God – at war on that scale now, but in economic terms we are deep in our own version of trench warfare and David Cameron has too little idea how to lead us out.

The current recession is the longest and (almost) the deepest in modern British history. Its costs are borne, primarily, by those least able to afford them. Those responsible for the damage – the bankers, the regulators, the New Labour generation of politicians – have been largely untouched. The fraudsters who manipulated LIBOR, who missold subprime assets, and so much else, are sitting in Monaco, instead of in jail. The politicians in charge now too often rely on soundbite and deflection; there’s still a shocking lack of transparency and accountability.

The British people bear all this with a huge amount of dignity. High inflation, stagnant wages, crazy property prices, an economy that seems only ever to move sideways? ah well, could be worse. Mustn’t grumble. We’re lions, led by donkeys.

What time is Murray Playing?

But it’s not just in Britain where an economic Great War is laying waste to lives and savings.

In the US, a presidential election is unfolding that will do nothing to solve the fiscal crisis that is engulfing the country of my birth. The fiscal problem has become so bad, the politicians can’t even talk about it. Republicans won’t raise taxes. Democrats won’t cut benefits. The result is a fiscal jam so bad that serious economists estimate true US indebtedness at over $200 trillion. That’s more than three times the total GDP of Planet Earth. And virtually no one talks about the issue.

In Europe, meantime, the latest rescue of the latest crisis is beginning to fail. Again. Spanish bond yields have fallen from their high of nearly 8.00%, but they’re still glued close to the 6.00% mark. And a country in deep financial crisis, mounting debt and deepening recession cannot fund itself at that rate for long. Meanwhile, the wealthy Catalans are beginning to reconsider their ties to the rest of Spain. The ratings agencies are cutting their ratings, again. Italy is in pretty much the same position, only a step or two behind. Germany is beginning to backtrack on the deals that averted the crisis that loomed earlier this summer. The slow-mo European crisis is getting ready for the next hideous encore.

Welcome to Spain - nearly 60% youth unemployment - this will not end well

 

 

You might think that nothing changes, but you’d be wrong. A year or two back, the IMF believed that a £1.00 cut in government spending would only reduce economic activity by £0.50, as new private sector growth surged into the gaps created. That clearly hasn’t happened. We’ve had the exact reverse pattern where increasing austerity has led to increasing recession… and an increased deterioration of government finances. The IMF now estimates that the same £1.00 cut actually depletes the economy by £1.30. The task ahead of us is getting worse.

It’s the same with the banks. Forget the pre-Thatcher miners or the teaching unions under Labour – if you want real government largesse, the financial sector still outshines the rest. When you hear of the Bank of England ‘pumping money into the economy’, what it is actually doing is propping up the trading profits of the same handful of bloated institutions that created this mess in the first place. And those self-same institutions are still not lending, the economy still not moving. Meantime, the stock of dubious debts and inflated assets rises just that little bit more. A burden that the rest of us will have to pay for: through absent growth, stagnant wages, high inflation, and a hopelessly unsustainable property bubble.

Amidst such confusion, it would be easy to think that there’s no fix out there. Easy and wrong. We don’t need rocket-science, we need common sense.

Although I don’t like a lot about what the current government is doing, I do like its approach to the deficit. Under George Osborne, the government is still borrowing 8p in every £1.00 generated by the economy. So when you earn £100 at work, the government has just borrowed £8. Since that’s obviously nuts, government borrowing needs to come down. At least Osborne has got that part right.

But then consider monetary policy. The Bank of England is widely expected to announce an expansion of its quantitative easing programme to £425 billion. Which is just a fancy way to say it’s printing £425 billion of new money, which is a sure fire way to create inflation. (Just ask Zimbabwe.) It’s craziness – or, in fact, craziness doubled, given that the intended effects of the policy (boost lending and encourage investment) have clearly not happened.

Or take the banks. It’s pretty obvious that bankers don’t need our sympathy. (Many of them, in fact, need jail terms.) Far from coddling the banks any further, we should force them to play by the same rules that all the rest of us have to live by. If a bank goes bust, it should be left to fail. Small depositors should be protected. Everyone else should get no sympathy. Instead, we pump money into the system and pretend we’re helping the broader economy. It’s insanity squared.

I wrote a book about these matters: Planet Ponzi, which is out now in paperback. That book tells you in detail, and in easy, everyday language, just how bad the problems are – and what we need to do to fix them.

I didn’t write the book because I wanted to make money, but out of belief – even passion. I’ve been involved in the financial markets for thirty years. Over that time I’ve seen a kind of sickness take hold. A belief in the power of debt. A belief that any problem is OK, so long as you can defer the reckoning. The sickness isn’t confined to Britain (though we are now the world’s most indebted country). The problem is equally bad in Europe, maybe worst of all in the United States.

The cure for this disease is, in essence, simple. It’s total transparency, total accountability. That needs to apply to politicians: no more false promises, no more evasions of responsibility. But the same magic formula needs to apply to banking and the media. And we, the voters, need to retain our sense of anger. When we hear politicians evading an important question, we need to demand a real answer. When we see bankers grossly manipulate the financial markets, we need to reject any outcome that does not end up with one or more bankers doing some serious jail time.

I first conceived of writing Planet Ponzi, when the first tremors of the financial quake were starting to strike. I thought the issues covered in the book were the most urgent matters facing the Western world since the end of the Second World War. I still do. It’s not too late to turn things around – but we can’t delay our actions any further. Planet Ponzi has got to stop. We still need our lions, but it’s time to lose the donkeys.

QE has created the worlds biggest housing and equities bubbles in the UK markets

Last week, the Bank of England declared its intention to print another £50 billion. Hardly anyone noticed. That £50 billion will bring the Bank’s total money printing to around £425 billion, or about one quarter of British GDP. No one cares. This evening, the U.S. Federal Reserve will announce its own plans for another round of “quantitative easing” aka QE infinity – a euphemistic term for “destroying the currency.” Not to be left out, the ECB has announced plans for unlimited bond buying (though Germany has, thank goodness, set some limits.) Given that the bonds the ECB wants to buy are issued by increasingly bankrupt Mediterranean governments, the ECB too is doing what it can to wreck the currency it’s charged to protect.

Given such public sector diligence, it’s hardly surprising that the private sector is getting creative all over again. And while creativity is normally thought of as a good thing, the same ingenuity in the hands of Wall Street is always a disaster. Take one recent news story. New rules, due to come in place next year, will force derivatives-traders to post collateral for their risky bets. Proper collateral. You know: U.S. Treasury bonds and the like, stuff you can rely on. Trouble is, the derivatives market is huge and good quality collateral is scarce. (Which is a good outcome, right? It would mean that only the most necessary derivatives trades get done.)

QE1 a failure, QE2 a failure, QE3 ??, money printing is all Bernanke knows...

Only that’s not how Wall Street sees these things. When they see the phrase “good quality collateral,” they instantly think, ‘how can we fake things so that crappy collateral manages to sneak through anyway?” And, what do you know, they’ve come up with a solution called collateral transformation. That solution is twisted enough that I won’t even describe it here — but suffice to say that it’s like the subprime markets all over again. It’s worse than that, actually, because at least with subprime there was a house at the end of the chain. Here, there’s dodgy collateral supporting a derivatives trade backed by a financial security backed by something else altogether. It’s subprime squared or subprime cubed.

But enough of all that. The Bank of England (and the Fed and the ECB) are all thrilled to the bottom of their inflation-creating hearts because the financial markets are boosted by all these interventions. The German stock market index, the DAX, is up 46 percent in the past twelve months and has almost doubled from its 2009 lows. Doubled. Would you like to write down on a sheet of paper all the good things that have happened to the German economy since 2009? If you do, you can use a very small sheet and still have room for plenty of doodles. The simple fact is that these financial market interventions have almost nothing to do with the real economy.

That same basic point is obvious in a million different ways. The London property market is hitting new heights — just when the British economy is spluttering to get out of its double-dip recession. The FTSE index is romping away — but George Osborne is hastily rewriting his budget projections as corporate tax revenues fall far short of what was expected. In the U.S., Apple, Inc. is hitting new extraordinary heights, even as the latest U.S. jobless figures show that people are quitting the labor force on a historically unprecedented scale.

That’s not to say that monetary expansion has no effect, just that the effects are almost entirely destructive. So property inflation is bad (that’s part of what got us into this mess), but it’s one of the most obvious symptoms of Mervyn King’s policies. Bubbliness in the financial markets is also terrible (that’s the other major part of what caused this mess), yet there they are once again, bubbling away, utterly disconnected from the brutal truth of the real economy. And of course as the major currencies fight each other in a race to the bottom, the commodities produced by the rest of the world, with their strengthening currencies, becomes more expensive too. Inflation starts to get baked in.

Inflation, and also indebtedness. The ECB wants to protect Europe by buying up ever larger chunks of poor-quality debt. But who are they kidding? Next year, Spain and Italy alone have to refinance more than €600 billion. The same again, give or take, the year after. And those numbers are as nothing compared with the amounts of private sector (mostly financial) debt that has to be refinanced. A trillion euros next year, €1.2 trillion the year after. These numbers can’t be rolled over by more smoke-and-mirrors. They can only be funded by sound public finance and strong private sector business growth. Needless to say, we don’t have either.

In truth, the lessons aren’t difficult to see. We need sound money and an end to financial engineering. If the rules say that derivatives trades need sound collateral, then any scheme which looks to evade those rules needs to get kicked into touch. (Or more. Rules need to be enforced or there’s no point in having them. In a sane world, the banks and bankers currently busy on ‘collateral transformation’ need to be stopped and held accountable.) Central banks need to forget about the ‘health’ of the financial markets altogether. It’s not their health that matters, it’s ours.

People will say — correctly — that coming off these drugs will produce one hell of a withdrawal period. That’s true, but it’s not a reason to keep someone on heroin. Quite the opposite. The Western world needs to relearn some simple lessons. If you make a bad loan, you’ll lose money. (You won’t get rescued by the taxpayer.) Investment banks are there to deliver useful services to real companies. (Anything else is yet another Ponzi scheme, and probably fraud.) Businesses will succeed by making and marketing fantastic products at competitive prices. (Financial engineering is meaningless and will always destroy value in the end.)

QE addicted market participants line up for another central bank fix

These lessons are obvious, but our policy-makers don’t hear them. Maybe George Osborne does to some extent, and Vince Cable too. But they’re swimming against a tide of denial. That tide is running as high as the global equities and fixed income markets. One day soon, the tide will drown us.

Accountable: A letter in the Sunday Times called for Osborne to begin spending cuts a year earlier than planned

In February 2010, twenty economists published a letter in the Sunday Times calling on George Osborne to begin spending cuts a year earlier than planned. The key sentence of that letter stated that, ‘In order to be credible, the government’s goal should be to eliminate the structural current budget deficit over the course of a parliament.’

The logic was clear. If you say you’re going to do something hard but essential, you need to do it at a credible pace. Saying you’re aiming to do something in five years time and after a general election is rather like admitting that you’ve no intention of doing it at all.

You probably agree with that logic. If you are in charge of your household budget and you notice that your expenditures are running ahead of your income, you’ll almost certainly want to address that gap right now this minute. It’s not pleasant doing it, but you do it anyway. Businesses think the same way.

What’s strange then is why those same economists have now reversed themselves. Just three of the original twenty economists are thought to stand by their original view. The Daily Telegraph will this week print opinion pieces from a range of other economists all calling upon the Chancellor to reverse course, slow down the fiscal tightening. Spend more, tax less.

Some of the specific ideas have real merit. Britain has an acute shortage of good affordable housing. Plenty of people would seek to buy a house if suitable properties were available at a vaguely sane price. Yet, as things stand, planning restrictions artificially restrict supply while the construction industry is staggering under its post-Olympic hangover. In principle, therefore, you could release demand and reignite an industry by changing planning laws so as to enable the provision of new homes.

Another good idea is widespread tax reform. The British tax system is too complicated and tax rates are too high. Simpler, broader taxes would allow tax rates to be lowered without any overall loss of revenue. The economy would surely benefit from such a reform. There would also be a huge boost to fairness, as the super-wealthy would find themselves having to pay tax instead of dodging it.

Bad plan: Certain other plans for spending cuts are just bananas, such as cutting stamp duty. Britain has long suffered from a huge property bubble, which is at its worst in London
So some of the ideas floating around at the moment are entirely valid. Some of the reforms mooted are obvious and overdue. But certain other ideas are just bananas. Cut stamp duty? Really? Britain has long suffered from a huge property bubble, which is at its worst in London.

A valid alternative? Alistair Darling wants new investment in power stations, airports and railways

Stamp duty is a tax that’s hard to evade and which keeps some kind of lid on prices. Abolishing the tax will just encourage prices upwards: a disastrous step backwards to the bubble economy of 1997-2008.

And higher prices will of course make it even harder for ordinary people to own their own homes, which should be a perfectly reasonable aspiration for working families in a twenty-first century democracy.

Other ideas are more marginal. Alistair Darling wants new investment in power stations, airports and railways.

He’s right, of course, that Britain’s infrastructure does look ragged compared with that of our European competitors. New investment makes good sense, in principle. But why should we expect the government to fund that investment? If there’s a market demand for new airport capacity, the private sector should be able to fund it. If planning restrictions get in the way, Osborne needs to look at the planning laws – he shouldn’t just pull his chequebook out. Same with the railways. Same with power. Those services need to exist, but they need to be funded by the people who use them. Any other approach is a reversion to the jam-today, pay-tomorrow culture of the previous decade.

This debate is going to rumble away for some time to come. Osborne will face a thousand calls from a thousand directions to reverse course, to back off, to ease the pain. But before you join that chorus, please just remember the position we’re in. According to the IMF’s data, the British government will this year borrow 8% of GDP. That’s £124 billion. Of every £1 that the government spends, about 18p is borrowed money. That’s plainly unsustainable.  If you look at all debt in the economy – household, government, corporate, banking – then our debt to GDP ratio is a terrifying 500%.

Those numbers were produced in April. Since then, the economy has deteriorated, the outlook darkened. That doesn’t make is less needful to get the finances in order, but more needful. This entire crisis – from the collapse of Northern Rock to the travails of the Eurozone – arose because of too much debt. Too much stupid debt. Urging George Osborne to borrow more for longer is like telling an alcoholic to use cider as a way to get through his whisky withdrawal pangs.

For the same reason, it’s sheer madness for the Bank of England to cast around for new ways to loosen policy. The IMF’s commodity price index has almost doubled from its early-2009 lows. London house prices are crazy. The financial markets are also at unsupportable levels. These things are certain harbingers of inflation – and sure enough, last month, the RPI inflation index rose again, to 3.2% and it won’t stop there.

You would think these things would act like a cold shower on policy-makers. That they would remind them of basic truths: that debt is bad, that fiscal responsibility matters, that money-printing is destructive. Instead, though, it sometimes seems that those in charge of policy will do anything but face the facts. There’s talk about changing the way inflation is calculated – the classic government dodge: if the facts don’t change, fiddle the numbers. Meanwhile, the IMF wants the Bank of England to cut the base rate from 0.5% to 0.0%, as though current rates aren’t already absurd. The lunatics are trying to take over the asylum.

But personally, I think George Osborne understands all this. He’s not a dummy. He gets that you can’t cut expenditure without causing pain. He understands that too many people are still hooked on the Ponzi-ish belief that we can enjoy things today and pay for them tomorrow. Over the next few years, George Osborne might not be Mr Popular. He may yet prove to be Mr Right.

The post garnered a remarkable number of comments, the majority of which agreed strongly with the view I expressed. Just one thing disturbed me, however, which was the number of people who assumed I was taking a partisan position. To remind you: the article argued strongly for a full and open enquiry into the Fast and Furious affair. I guess a lot of people reasoned as follows, ‘The Republicans are bashing the Democrats over this enquiry, this guy Feierstein wants an enquiry, so he must be a Republican.’

I don’t blame people for making these assumptions. Our whole country has become infected with this kind of logic. Our entire political debate has caught the virus. Yet it makes no sense. No sense at all. Here are two facts and one conclusion. Fact One: A federal agent has been shot dead. Fact Two: there are allegations — which may be true or false — that the gun used to shoot him was in circulation only because of an ineptly managed operation conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms and Tobacco. Conclusion: These allegations are serious enough to deserve an open investigation, period. Partisan bickering and political spin is simply a diversion from the action that a dead federal agent deserves — and the truth that the American people require.

I say all this because I’m about to call attention to another government department. That department is the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Now I know that Republicans are currently bashing President Obama over his jobs record. I know that Obama is bashing back. But, people, the issue at stake is the creation of jobs in America and the way those things are being recorded and reported. The issues I’m about to address were present under George W. Bush. They haven’t changed under Barack Obama. The depression which struck this country in the wake of financial crisis might have peaked under a Democrat, but it was born in a Republican era. If you yourself are so partisan that you want to make fine distinctions about these things, you should go ahead and make them. Me: I see two peas in a pod.

Good. Preamble over. Here’s the issue. The number of jobs created in America stood at 80,000 in June. That wasn’t nearly enough to budge the jobless rate, which remains stuck at a high 8.2%. (Mitt Romney’s comment: ‘another kick in the gut to middle-class families.’ Barack Obama’s rejoinder: ‘a step in the right direction’ whilst he acknowledged, ‘it’s still tough out there.’)

But let’s put the partisan spin-factory to one side, and instead have a think about the number of jobs being reported. Businesses are born and businesses die. When a business is occupied with either of those processes, it has better things to do than call up the BLS and discuss hires and fires. The BLS therefore estimates the net impact on the joblessness figures of the birth and death of businesses. You can read its full discussion here, but the key line says:

‘There is an unavoidable lag between an establishment opening for business and its appearing on the sample frame and being available for sampling. Because new firm births generate a portion of employment growth each month, non-sampling methods must be used to estimate this growth.’

A non-sampling method: that’s geek-speak for ‘guess.’ We don’t know how many new jobs are being created or lost by business churn, so we’ve got to guess. And you want to know the BLS’s estimate for the number of such jobs ‘created’ (net of losses) in June? Answer: 124,000. In May, the answer was over 200,000.

So, in crude terms, the net jobs growth reported by the BLS — the same one being lambasted by Romney and praised by Obama — is only in positive territory at all because of some number that’s simply a guess. A smart guess probably. One made by intelligent statisticians… but still. In this economy? With Europe in turmoil, China slowing, the country heading for a fiscal cliff which could thrust us back into recession, plus massive uncertainty over the path of healthcare costs per employee? The BLS has never been in this position before, because the economy hasn’t been. And after all, who in their right minds would be hiring new staff given these conditions? Most savvy businesspeople will be watching, waiting… deferring spending and hiring.

The truth is employment in the U.S. might be growing or shrinking. We just plain don’t know. What we do know is that if you add together the unemployed, workers discouraged from seeking work, plus those working part-time when they’d prefer to be working full time… you have an ‘underemployment’ rate of at least 15% — while our labor force participation rates are kicking around decade long-lows. These things are terrible economic news, but they’re terrible on a human scale too. Let’s consider the graduates looking to repay the more than $1 trillion in government-guaranteed student loans. These graduates are America’s future. Those BLS data points represent human lives, human potential. And the outlook is grim.

Vangelia Pandeva Dimitrova

To repeat, I’m not making a partisan point here. I’m making a bigger one. The American economy is in deep trouble. The reported data we have is unreliable. What we do know is that we have too much debt, too much money printing, a culture of total irresponsibility on Wall Street and consequently an absence of credibility in the financial and political promises that underpin our economy. All this, plus a political culture which is not addressing these things in a mature and responsible way.

This country’s in a mess. And partisan bickering will never pull us out of it. We all need to change our mindsets. I voted for change in the last election and I believe that today’s DC landscape is the most polarized in my lifetime. Are things better? Are we going to be offered a real choice in this election year? And where can I get a refund?

I published this article in today’s Huffington Post.

Two bits of news in the last couple days. One, Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, has decided to extend Operation Twist, a policy whereby the Fed sells short-dated government paper in order to buy the longer-dated sort. It sounds boring but it involves $267 billion, so it’s kind of consequential all the same. Oh, and traders warn that the disappearance of the Fed’s holdings of short-dated government paper could gum up those markets, thereby causing costs greater thany any likely benefit. But still, mere reality doesn’t deter Bernanke, who asserts, ”We are prepared to do what’s necessary. We are prepared to provide support for the economy. Additional asset purchases would be among the things that we would certainly consider if we need to take additional measures to strengthen the economy.”

So: $267 billion of your money is being put at risk on a complex long-dated debt operation of dubious benefit, while the leader of that operation comments that much more money might be needed down the road. That’s news item one.

Money printing is all I know.....

News item two: Moody’s announced a mass downgrade of American and European banks. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley took a hit. So did Bank of America, JP Morgan and Citigroup. So too did a raft of European banks, including some of the biggest. The markets didn’t react much to these downgrades, but only because the credit failings of these banks has long been baked into the price. Credit default swaps on two nationalized British banks, RBS and Lloyds, are already priced at junk levels. Anything Moody’s says now is like a punch line delivered long after the party guests have departed. In reality, the truth is probably worse even than Moody’s is suggesting. Many of these banks will see further downgrades, some of them sharp, before this crisis is done.

Now these things are connected. They’re connected in the simplest of ways. The central banks are committed to a policy of debasing the currency, manipulating interest rates and artificially inflating asset bubbles. Meantime, the Western financial system is in parlous shape. Well, duh! Of course. You don’t fix lousy banks by printing wild sums of money to prop up the markets. You fix lousy banks by writing off bad loans, forcing shareholders and creditors to take the hit. You clean up and move on. It’s so obvious a child could see it.

But not Ben Bernanke. Part of the problem is a kind of academic groupthink. Two of the world’s leading central bankers are Ben Bernanke of the Fed and Mervyn King of the Bank of England. King was a visiting professor at Harvard and then MIT, where he shared an office with the then Assistant Professor Ben Bernanke. They come from the same intellectual hutch, the same narrow world-view.

And please note, that world view is born of academic theory, not practical reality. It’s born of an obsession with the Great Depression in the 1930s … forgetting that everything, but everything, has changed since then. Back then, trade was limited, international finance modest, government finances strong, consumer credit exceptionally low, derivative markets all but non-existent. Not one of those things is true today. Government finances are shot to hell. Derivatives markets have bcome too big to regulate and too vast to fail. Consumer credit is terrifying. And the whole world is connected in one lethal stew of poor credit, mistrust and non-disclosure of losses.

So let’s keep this simple. I argue the Great Depression has almost nothing to teach us. The academic central bankers who have guided us into this crisis, and have been printing money throughout it, are only making the problem worse. The mess our banks are in is in large part due to the failures of these same central bankers, the like-minded Nobel laureates and the same old recycled economic advisors.

The recipe for recovery is simple too. You need to rip the bandages off. It’ll hurt, but the patient will get better. Banks (and central bankers) need to face up to their losses. If shareholders and bondholders have lost money, then tough. Why on earth should taxpayers pick up this tab? Because the banks have hired expensive lobbyists to purchase politicians’ favor? I don’t think so.

We are currently in the midst of a major depression. Unemployment (measured by U-6) is at almost 15%. The economic projections in the White House’s budget are clearly powered by the kind of substances that President Clinton once smoked (but did not inhale). The government deficit is in meltdown, yet hasn’t remotely engineered the kind of growth-led recovery we had been led to expect.

I’m not surprised. Here on Planet Ponzi we hold these truths to be self-evident. That the Fed is becoming impotent; it’s running out of bullets. The Fed is out of touch with reality, printing trillions of dollars without the consent of the people of America. That the Fed is taking on a giagantic risk position in long-dated securities, which will have catastrophic consequences if — or rather when — interest rates rise. That existing policies have clearly, plainly and unequivocally failed — yet are still being implemented seemingly without end.

It’s time for a change, and the change can’t come too soon.

I published this in todays Huffington Post

‘Frankly, we are not here to receive lessons in terms of democracy or in terms of how to handle the economy,’ he said. ‘This crisis was not originated in Europe; seeing as you mention North America, this crisis originated in North America and much of our financial sector was contaminated by, how can I put it, unorthodox practices, from some sectors of the financial market.’

Hmmm. So evil Americans are responsible for European woes, huh? That’s an interesting claim, but does it really stand up? And who, really, is to blame for this extraordinary mess?

Who’s to blame? World leaders assemble for the G20 summit in Los Cabos, Mexico

In the spirit of Euro 2012, I thought I’d follow a system of ‘player ratings’. I’ve listed the major players in the Eurozone crisis below. A score of 10 implies, ‘Totally to blame. Why are these guys not in jail already?’ A score of 0 implies … well, it doesn’t really matter: there are no zeroes. Who’s to blame for the Euro crisis? Here are the major players with their scores.

1. American Banks 4/10

OK, I’m no fan of the US banking system. US regulators completely failed to enforce their own rules. The banks screwed up horribly and did a vast amount of damage to the the US economy. But there’s the point: they blew up the American finance system, not the European one. Get a map, Manuel. That big blue thing? It’s the Atlantic Ocean.

2. European banks 9/10

European banks, on the other hand, are vastly to blame for the mess in Europe. For one thing, a lot of the mess in the US was created by the US subsidiaries of European banks: outfits like HSBC, Deutsche, RBS. But then Societe Generale, Paribas, Lloyds, Northern Rock, Bankia, Unicredit, Dexia – these are all home-grown awful, and it’s their problems which have added so much to the European debt load.

Star performer: Greece must take full responsibility

3. Greece (Star Player) 10/10

Every team needs a star man, a Steven Gerrard, Captain Reliable character. The Euro-Blame Team has to name Greece as that €500 billion star. It cooked its books. It never even attempted to reform its economy. It doesn’t get its citizens to pay taxes. It offers crazy pensions. Its rail system notches up losses that exceed its sales. It has a mountain of Ponzi debt that, even after vast write-offs, will be unpayable. You can’t beat that performance. Greece: it’s ten out of ten, all the way.

4. Spanish Real Estate 9/10

It wasn’t so long ago that the Spanish state looked prudent. It had debt levels way lower than those of Germany. (Indeed, it still does.) Its economy thrived. It had a team that played beautiful football. What could possibly be wrong with this picture? Answer: a real estate bubble even worse than the one in America and Ireland. A bubble that Spanish regulators never even attempted to address. A bubble that is currently threatening to wreck not just the Spanish government, but the entire Euro project.

Spain is higher up the radar of international investors at the moment, but Italy is a whale of even larger dimensions. In the decade to 2010, do you want to know how many economies had worse growth than Italy’s? Answer: just two. Zimbabwe and Haiti. If you add to that terrible economic performance a mountainous debt and a corrupt and dysfunctional state – well, 8/10 seems way too generous. I must be Mr Nice Guy as it’s sunny in London today. Portugal, by the way, has somewhat similar problems, but the country’s size means I can’t award it more than a 6/10. Think of it as an impact sub.

6. France 6/10

France lies even further from international radars than its two big southern neighbours, but when you think about a highly indebted country with an exceptionally leveraged banking system, gigantic unfunded pension liabilities, an addiction to state spending, and huge assets parked in the not-so-safe countries of the Mediterranean … well, you probably don’t feel like putting your funds on deposit anywhere that smells of garlic. Stay away.

7. The European Central Bank 9/10

The ECB. What can you say? How Ponzi-ish, irresponsible, non-transparent and undemocratic can a central bank be? The answer, it seems, is ‘very’, four times over. The ECB enabled asset bubbles to form in Spain and elsewhere. It permitted a vastly overleveraged financial sector. And its response to crisis: to extend trillions of euros in soft loans to insolvent banks to gamble on dubious bonds issued by failing governments. That’s not monetary policy. It’s monetary insanity.

Damaging to Britain: But can Sir Mervyn King and Gordon Brown really be blamed for the eurozone crisis?

8. Gordon Brown & Swervyn Mervyn King 6/10

If we were talking about how far this pair of superheroes had injured the UK economy, we’d be pulling out perfect tens. But the question here is about the damage to the European economy and although Britain has been saddled with eye-watering debt, hideous inflation, rotten banks and a stagnant economy, those things have only a marginal impact on the Eurozone. That little strip of blue, Manuel? It’s the English Channel. (And don’t call it La Manche.)

9. Angela Merkel 7/10

OK, this is a tough one. Germany has a strong economy. It has weak and overleveraged banks, a scarily under-recognised pension problem, and too much government debt. But still. Angela and team didn’t create this problem, they’ve only compounded it. They’ve compounded it by always choosing to kick the can down the road, instead of addressing and fixing the giant issues in the European system. Germany’s not mostly to blame, but still. It should have done so much better.

10. Jacques Delors 9/10

Jacques Delors, the principal architect of the Euro, has admitted that the project was structurally flawed from the outset. He’s even admitted that British objections to the idea had real substance. (Thanks, Jacques, and it only took you 15 years to figure that out.) Basically, this project could never have worked and now here it is not working. Quelle surprise.

L’homme culpable: European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso should take a look in the mirror

11. Jose Manuel Barroso 9/10

Manuel Barroso: if you have a mirror anywhere in your €1.4 billion offices, take a look. The person looking out at you is responsible for maintaining and boosting an impossible system. If EU officials had ever had any respect for democracy, this crisis would never have occurred. If the EU had ever recognised the real gravity of the crisis, if it had allocated blame and responsibility in the right quarters and in a timely way, this would never have happened. Manuel Barroso, l’homme culpable – c’est vous.

Meantime, and in light of the football theme of this article, I have a simple, neat suggestion to make everything right. Spain wants to be bailed out by the German taxpayer. German taxpayers, understandably, aren’t all that keen with the idea. But there’s a footie tournament on, right? Spain and Germany: the two favourites. So what about a simple little wager, double or quits according to which team fares better. And that’s a game I’d pay to see. 

I published this in todays Daily Mail

The United Kingdom has too much debt. Reports normally focus on government debt: currently around 80% of national income, unless you take into account (as you should) the debts of the bailed-out banks and their toxic portfolios, which would pretty much double that figure.

But what about consumer debt? Mortgage debt? Business debt? The huge slabs of debt incurred by our banking system? The truth is, if you want to know how much the United Kingdom owes, you need to add up everything.

And the answer is terrifying. We owe about 500% of GDP. So for every pound you earn in a year, someone, somewhere owes £5.  Add it all up and you get to a total just shy of £8 trillion.

Burden: Including bank bailouts, the UK’s national debt is already around 160% of GDP

You don’t have to be a rocket-scientist to figure out that this is a problem. Indeed, you’d have to be living under a stone not to have noticed that our economy has plunged into a depression because of this weight of debt. The banks started it, but we’re all in it together. And it’s not just Britain, it’s Europe too. And the US economy is way more fragile than is sometimes reported.

The dictionary definition of a depression is ‘a sustained, long-term downturn in economic activity in one or more economies. It is a more severe downturn than a recession, which is seen by some economists as part of the modern business cycle.’ That’s us. That’s where we are. The Great Depression of the 1930s did not destroy output to the same degree and recovery was faster. This is the worst depression in British economic history.

And what is the solution to this crisis, as cooked up between George Osborne and Mervyn King, the Bank of England chief? 

I love Wimbledon, it's Smashing!

George Osborne and Mervyn King have announced their intention to make around £100bn of cheap loans available to banks, allowing them to lend to businesses

Answer: more debt! Clearly, these wise souls believe that the whole problem with the British economy is that we don’t have enough debt. So let’s have more. In fact – and how’s this for a plan? – let’s make soft loans at cheap rates to the same klutzy British banks that created this mess in the first place and hope that somehow that sparks off a spiral of investment and innovation. You might as well plan for world peace by selling arms to the Middle East. (Or, come to think of it, making Tony Blair a peace envoy.) It’s the same crazed logic.

Fortunately, though, businesses aren’t stupid. The main barrier to investment isn’t the availability of credit; it’s the dire economy. Businesses are, quite rightly, looking at the devastation and lack of governance around them and thinking this might not be the best possible time to launch new ventures or expand old ones.

And the solution?  Well, there isn’t one short of de-leveraging. The only way to a problem of excessive debt is to have less debt. You can’t achieve that by waving a magic wand, you achieve it by working hard, paying down your loans, and remembering that, next time, you better keep your credit card in your pocket when you pass those nice, inviting stores.

But meantime, the plan does reveal something important about the decision-makers in charge of the economy. George Osborne I have some time for: at least he realises he needs to get the government to borrow less; at least he knows that the banks have to be tamed. But Mervyn King: what is he for? We are currently paying him to print money and shovel cheap loans at dodgy banks fueling a property bubble of epic proportion. 

Athens burns: Does this look like the creation of aggregate demand, Mr King?

Creating asset bubbles and money printing are terrible policies that King has become addicted to. He’s past his sell by date and has to go.
 

I published this in the Daily Mail